<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 802 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426563</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the decision of the CIT(A) to delete the transfer pricing adjustments for Assessment Year 2004-05. The Tribunal found the methodology adopted by the assessee, a 100% EOU, appropriate and consistent with accepted practices. Additionally, the Tribunal condoned the delay in the appeal, allowing it to proceed for substantive review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2022 08:28:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 802 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426563</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the decision of the CIT(A) to delete the transfer pricing adjustments for Assessment Year 2004-05. The Tribunal found the methodology adopted by the assessee, a 100% EOU, appropriate and consistent with accepted practices. Additionally, the Tribunal condoned the delay in the appeal, allowing it to proceed for substantive review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>