<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 792 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426553</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 60,00,000 under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, as the assessee failed to prove the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions. The denial of cross-examination and levy of interest were deemed unsubstantiated. The initiation of penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) was considered lawful. The appeal was dismissed on 16th August 2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2022 08:27:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 792 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426553</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 60,00,000 under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, as the assessee failed to prove the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions. The denial of cross-examination and levy of interest were deemed unsubstantiated. The initiation of penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) was considered lawful. The appeal was dismissed on 16th August 2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>