<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 779 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426540</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting some additions made under Sections 41(1), 68, and 69 of the Income Tax Act. The additions under Section 41(1) were deleted as the debts were acknowledged in the balance sheet, and the cessation of liability was not legally established. For Section 68, the addition related to a discrepancy in the cash book opening balance was upheld, while the additions for unexplained cash credit and cash book entry dates were deleted or remitted back to the AO for reconciliation. Under Section 69, the addition for unexplained investment in house construction was reduced and remitted back to the AO for reconsideration. The issue of interest under Sections 234B and 234C was not specifically addressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2022 09:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 779 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426540</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting some additions made under Sections 41(1), 68, and 69 of the Income Tax Act. The additions under Section 41(1) were deleted as the debts were acknowledged in the balance sheet, and the cessation of liability was not legally established. For Section 68, the addition related to a discrepancy in the cash book opening balance was upheld, while the additions for unexplained cash credit and cash book entry dates were deleted or remitted back to the AO for reconciliation. Under Section 69, the addition for unexplained investment in house construction was reduced and remitted back to the AO for reconsideration. The issue of interest under Sections 234B and 234C was not specifically addressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>