<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 775 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426536</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, upholding the decision to disallow the claimed cost of improvement for computing Long Term Capital Gains. The Tribunal found the affidavit provided by the assessee insufficient and lacking specific details, emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence to support claims in tax matters. The judgment highlights the necessity of substantiating claims with verifiable documentation to ensure accurate determination of tax liabilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2022 09:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 775 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426536</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, upholding the decision to disallow the claimed cost of improvement for computing Long Term Capital Gains. The Tribunal found the affidavit provided by the assessee insufficient and lacking specific details, emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence to support claims in tax matters. The judgment highlights the necessity of substantiating claims with verifiable documentation to ensure accurate determination of tax liabilities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>