<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 771 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426532</link>
    <description>Lathe, drilling and hopping machines supplied to technical and engineering colleges for teaching purposes were treated as falling within &quot;scientific equipment and instruments&quot; under the concessional CST notification. The certificate condition was satisfied, and the interpretive approach was strict but not so narrow as to exclude educational use where the articles served instructional functions in technical institutions. A contrary authority on steam boilers was distinguished because those were common utility articles and not comparable on these facts. The assessment revision was therefore unsustainable, and the assessment orders were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2022 08:25:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 771 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426532</link>
      <description>Lathe, drilling and hopping machines supplied to technical and engineering colleges for teaching purposes were treated as falling within &quot;scientific equipment and instruments&quot; under the concessional CST notification. The certificate condition was satisfied, and the interpretive approach was strict but not so narrow as to exclude educational use where the articles served instructional functions in technical institutions. A contrary authority on steam boilers was distinguished because those were common utility articles and not comparable on these facts. The assessment revision was therefore unsustainable, and the assessment orders were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>