https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426525 The Tribunal's jurisdiction to enforce execution of conveyance and sale deeds was upheld, with Rule 11 inherent powers held available and the objection that only a civil court could grant relief rejected. The repeal of SICA did not extinguish the BIFR order confirming the sale, because the repeal statute saved such prior orders and left them operative and binding. On that basis, the surviving BIFR directions were enforceable before the Tribunal, and the respondents were required to complete the conveyancing and related acts in accordance with the confirmed sale process. en-us Fri, 12 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Aug 2022 08:24:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426525 The Tribunal's jurisdiction to enforce execution of conveyance and sale deeds was upheld, with Rule 11 inherent powers held available and the objection that only a civil court could grant relief rejected. The repeal of SICA did not extinguish the BIFR order confirming the sale, because the repeal statute saved such prior orders and left them operative and binding. On that basis, the surviving BIFR directions were enforceable before the Tribunal, and the respondents were required to complete the conveyancing and related acts in accordance with the confirmed sale process. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Fri, 12 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426525