<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 759 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426520</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the application of the peak credit theory in determining undisclosed income but directed the Assessing Officer to verify the peak credit calculation based on cash receipts and withdrawals. The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, modifying the directions given by the CIT(A) and emphasizing the importance of accurately assessing unexplained income in cases involving money lending activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2022 08:23:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 759 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426520</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the application of the peak credit theory in determining undisclosed income but directed the Assessing Officer to verify the peak credit calculation based on cash receipts and withdrawals. The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, modifying the directions given by the CIT(A) and emphasizing the importance of accurately assessing unexplained income in cases involving money lending activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>