<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 744 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426505</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 3,50,00,000 under Section 68 as unexplained cash credits, dismissing the appeal of the assessee. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had validly utilized incriminating material found during the search, rejecting the arguments challenging the authority of the Assessing Officer under Section 153A, the absence of incriminating material, the discharge of onus under Section 68, and the rejection of the assessment order of share applicants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2022 08:17:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 744 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426505</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 3,50,00,000 under Section 68 as unexplained cash credits, dismissing the appeal of the assessee. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had validly utilized incriminating material found during the search, rejecting the arguments challenging the authority of the Assessing Officer under Section 153A, the absence of incriminating material, the discharge of onus under Section 68, and the rejection of the assessment order of share applicants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>