<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 738 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426499</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2012-13, ruling that the penalty for concealment of income was unjustified as the quantum appeal favoring the assessee was allowed. Similarly, in the appeal for the Assessment Year 2015-16, the Tribunal upheld the exemption granted to the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2022 08:17:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 738 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426499</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2012-13, ruling that the penalty for concealment of income was unjustified as the quantum appeal favoring the assessee was allowed. Similarly, in the appeal for the Assessment Year 2015-16, the Tribunal upheld the exemption granted to the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>