<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 737 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426498</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the Revenue&#039;s and assessee&#039;s appeals. The disallowance of Trademark License Utilisation Fees was deleted, emphasizing no dispute on ownership and royalty payments. The addition of delayed payment of Employees&#039; contribution to P.F. &amp;amp; E.S.I.C. was upheld, aligning with legal precedents despite the assessee&#039;s reliance on Section 43B.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2022 15:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 737 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426498</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the Revenue&#039;s and assessee&#039;s appeals. The disallowance of Trademark License Utilisation Fees was deleted, emphasizing no dispute on ownership and royalty payments. The addition of delayed payment of Employees&#039; contribution to P.F. &amp;amp; E.S.I.C. was upheld, aligning with legal precedents despite the assessee&#039;s reliance on Section 43B.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>