https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426454 A quashing petition under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was declined where the limitation objection was still a disputed question of fact and law pending before the trial court. The High Court noted that cognizance had already been taken and that no conclusive determination of limitation had yet been made in the complaint proceedings. In that position, it refused to grant effective relief in the quashing jurisdiction and left the limitation issue to be decided by the trial court after hearing both sides in accordance with law. en-us Thu, 28 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Aug 2022 08:13:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426454 A quashing petition under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was declined where the limitation objection was still a disputed question of fact and law pending before the trial court. The High Court noted that cognizance had already been taken and that no conclusive determination of limitation had yet been made in the complaint proceedings. In that position, it refused to grant effective relief in the quashing jurisdiction and left the limitation issue to be decided by the trial court after hearing both sides in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426454