<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1834 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303834</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing them to avail Cenvat Credit on furnace oil used in manufacturing fuel oil. The Tribunal found that the blending process resulted in a new product, justifying the credit. Additionally, the appellant&#039;s disclosure of activities and credit availment negated allegations of mis-declaration and suppression of facts. The Tribunal held that the extended period of limitation was inapplicable due to the appellant&#039;s full disclosure. No penalty was imposed as there was no suppression of facts. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2022 08:13:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1834 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303834</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing them to avail Cenvat Credit on furnace oil used in manufacturing fuel oil. The Tribunal found that the blending process resulted in a new product, justifying the credit. Additionally, the appellant&#039;s disclosure of activities and credit availment negated allegations of mis-declaration and suppression of facts. The Tribunal held that the extended period of limitation was inapplicable due to the appellant&#039;s full disclosure. No penalty was imposed as there was no suppression of facts. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>