<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 1336 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303837</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the order rejecting an appeal under the Chhattisgarh GST Act due to being filed beyond the prescribed limitation period. The petitioner&#039;s argument for condonation of delay based on their Chartered Accountant&#039;s ill health was not accepted, emphasizing statutory limits to prevent abuse of process. The Court cited Supreme Court precedents stating that delays cannot be condoned beyond stipulated periods, even in exceptional circumstances. The petitioner&#039;s plea for interference was rejected, with the Court upholding the order&#039;s validity based on statutory limitations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 10:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 1336 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303837</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the order rejecting an appeal under the Chhattisgarh GST Act due to being filed beyond the prescribed limitation period. The petitioner&#039;s argument for condonation of delay based on their Chartered Accountant&#039;s ill health was not accepted, emphasizing statutory limits to prevent abuse of process. The Court cited Supreme Court precedents stating that delays cannot be condoned beyond stipulated periods, even in exceptional circumstances. The petitioner&#039;s plea for interference was rejected, with the Court upholding the order&#039;s validity based on statutory limitations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>