https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303829 A Presidential Order suspending enforcement of specified fundamental rights did not bar scrutiny of executive action where the proceeding did not seek enforcement of the suspended right itself, so the maintainability objection failed. The Court held that detention orders under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 could validly operate against persons outside India because the legislative scheme contemplated extra-territorial application and protected the orders from challenge on that ground. Proclamations issued under Section 7(1)(c) read with Section 82 were sustained because material existed to support a belief that the persons had absconded or concealed themselves to evade execution of the detention orders. en-us Wed, 23 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Aug 2022 15:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303829 A Presidential Order suspending enforcement of specified fundamental rights did not bar scrutiny of executive action where the proceeding did not seek enforcement of the suspended right itself, so the maintainability objection failed. The Court held that detention orders under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 could validly operate against persons outside India because the legislative scheme contemplated extra-territorial application and protected the orders from challenge on that ground. Proclamations issued under Section 7(1)(c) read with Section 82 were sustained because material existed to support a belief that the persons had absconded or concealed themselves to evade execution of the detention orders. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 23 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303829