https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303827 The Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 was upheld as a valid special consolidation framework because persons whose holdings fall within consolidation areas form a separate class, and vesting title-dispute jurisdiction in consolidation authorities has a rational nexus with speedy land consolidation; exclusion of ordinary civil court adjudication did not violate Article 14. Section 4(c) was also sustained and read narrowly so that only proceedings concerning rights or interests in land subject to consolidation abate, while unrelated reliefs may continue. Sections 15 and 16 were held not to be inconsistent, and the suit was found to fall within Section 4(c) and therefore abated. en-us Fri, 09 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Aug 2022 14:56:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303827 The Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 was upheld as a valid special consolidation framework because persons whose holdings fall within consolidation areas form a separate class, and vesting title-dispute jurisdiction in consolidation authorities has a rational nexus with speedy land consolidation; exclusion of ordinary civil court adjudication did not violate Article 14. Section 4(c) was also sustained and read narrowly so that only proceedings concerning rights or interests in land subject to consolidation abate, while unrelated reliefs may continue. Sections 15 and 16 were held not to be inconsistent, and the suit was found to fall within Section 4(c) and therefore abated. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 09 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303827