<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 690 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426451</link>
    <description>SC allowed the appeal and reversed the High Court&#039;s interference. The Court held writ of mandamus may issue where an enforceable public duty exists, but technicalities cannot bar relief; nonetheless here the classification and GST/HSN determination in tenders is primarily the bidders&#039; responsibility and not a mandatory public duty of the procuring authority. The reverse-charge and payment rules protect public interest where tax is under- or mis-stated. The SC directed successful-contract documents be forwarded to the jurisdictional tax officer to ensure tax compliance, and restrained the impugned judgment from displacing the procurement regime.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 17:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 690 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426451</link>
      <description>SC allowed the appeal and reversed the High Court&#039;s interference. The Court held writ of mandamus may issue where an enforceable public duty exists, but technicalities cannot bar relief; nonetheless here the classification and GST/HSN determination in tenders is primarily the bidders&#039; responsibility and not a mandatory public duty of the procuring authority. The reverse-charge and payment rules protect public interest where tax is under- or mis-stated. The SC directed successful-contract documents be forwarded to the jurisdictional tax officer to ensure tax compliance, and restrained the impugned judgment from displacing the procurement regime.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>