<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 685 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426446</link>
    <description>Advances received from flat buyers under a development agreement did not constitute taxable income in the year of receipt where the land remained with the owners until completion, the assessee consistently followed the completed contract method, and the receipts were only advances against future sale proceeds. As the project was completed later, occupation certificates were obtained in the completion years, and the same receipts were offered to tax in those years, taxing them earlier would have resulted in premature taxation of the same income. The Tribunal held that the income was correctly assessable only on project completion and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 13:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 685 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426446</link>
      <description>Advances received from flat buyers under a development agreement did not constitute taxable income in the year of receipt where the land remained with the owners until completion, the assessee consistently followed the completed contract method, and the receipts were only advances against future sale proceeds. As the project was completed later, occupation certificates were obtained in the completion years, and the same receipts were offered to tax in those years, taxing them earlier would have resulted in premature taxation of the same income. The Tribunal held that the income was correctly assessable only on project completion and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>