<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 673 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426434</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessment proceedings due to the invalid service of notice under Section 143(2), rendering the assessment void ab initio. The additions made by the Assessing Officer were deleted by the CIT(A) and upheld by the Tribunal, as they were based on fictitious entries without tax implications. The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2022 08:09:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 673 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426434</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessment proceedings due to the invalid service of notice under Section 143(2), rendering the assessment void ab initio. The additions made by the Assessing Officer were deleted by the CIT(A) and upheld by the Tribunal, as they were based on fictitious entries without tax implications. The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>