<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 647 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , INDORE BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426408</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, citing the need for further inquiry beyond its jurisdiction due to conflicting claims and defenses. The disputes raised by the parties required a more comprehensive investigation, leading to the rejection of the insolvency application without costs and directing the Registry to serve the order to both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2022 08:07:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 647 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , INDORE BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426408</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, citing the need for further inquiry beyond its jurisdiction due to conflicting claims and defenses. The disputes raised by the parties required a more comprehensive investigation, leading to the rejection of the insolvency application without costs and directing the Registry to serve the order to both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>