<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 646 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426407</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s activity of supplying explosives constituted a sale of goods and not a provision of service. As a result, the appellant was found not liable to pay Service Tax, and the demand for such tax, interest, and penalties was deemed unsustainable. The Tribunal set aside the orders against the appellant, allowing the appeals with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 12:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 646 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426407</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s activity of supplying explosives constituted a sale of goods and not a provision of service. As a result, the appellant was found not liable to pay Service Tax, and the demand for such tax, interest, and penalties was deemed unsustainable. The Tribunal set aside the orders against the appellant, allowing the appeals with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>