<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1797 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303814</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the assessment order challenged by the petitioner and directing the Assessing Officer to adhere to previous directions. The court determined that the proceedings were for recovery, not assessment, thus dismissing the respondent&#039;s plea of limitation. No costs were awarded, and pending miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2022 08:05:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=688005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1797 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303814</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the assessment order challenged by the petitioner and directing the Assessing Officer to adhere to previous directions. The court determined that the proceedings were for recovery, not assessment, thus dismissing the respondent&#039;s plea of limitation. No costs were awarded, and pending miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>