<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 13 - CESTAT  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30142</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD allowed the appeal, directing the original adjudicating authority to verify if cell phones were indeed used for attending customer calls to qualify for input tax credit. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of establishing a nexus between input and output services for eligibility of tax credit. The penalty imposed on the appellant was set aside as the dispute pertained to legal interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 13 - CESTAT  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30142</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD allowed the appeal, directing the original adjudicating authority to verify if cell phones were indeed used for attending customer calls to qualify for input tax credit. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of establishing a nexus between input and output services for eligibility of tax credit. The penalty imposed on the appellant was set aside as the dispute pertained to legal interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>