https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303819 The Supreme Court held that candidates had no enforceable right to an extra attempt or age relaxation in the Civil Services Examination beyond the governing scheme, which fixed entry and exit ages and limited relaxations to specified categories. The Covid-19 disruption did not create a legal entitlement to a fresh attempt, particularly where the examination had been deferred and additional opportunities were already granted. The Court also found that the proposed one-time relaxation could not be judicially expanded, as policy choices in competitive examinations are open to review only if arbitrary or capricious, and courts cannot direct a policy contrary to the rules. en-us Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Aug 2022 08:05:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303819 The Supreme Court held that candidates had no enforceable right to an extra attempt or age relaxation in the Civil Services Examination beyond the governing scheme, which fixed entry and exit ages and limited relaxations to specified categories. The Covid-19 disruption did not create a legal entitlement to a fresh attempt, particularly where the examination had been deferred and additional opportunities were already granted. The Court also found that the proposed one-time relaxation could not be judicially expanded, as policy choices in competitive examinations are open to review only if arbitrary or capricious, and courts cannot direct a policy contrary to the rules. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303819