https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303818 The Supreme Court, comprising Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra, JJ., allowed the Review Petitions, overturning the previous dismissal of the Special Leave Petitions on 12 July, 2010. The Court recalled the order dated 12 July, 2010, and restored the Special Leave Petitions to file due to an inadvertent error in the office report, emphasizing the importance of rectifying mistakes promptly to ensure justice. The involvement of the Union of India through the Learned Additional Solicitor General underscores the significance of governmental representation in legal proceedings, highlighting the judiciary's commitment to procedural fairness and rectifying errors. en-us Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Aug 2022 08:05:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303818 The Supreme Court, comprising Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra, JJ., allowed the Review Petitions, overturning the previous dismissal of the Special Leave Petitions on 12 July, 2010. The Court recalled the order dated 12 July, 2010, and restored the Special Leave Petitions to file due to an inadvertent error in the office report, emphasizing the importance of rectifying mistakes promptly to ensure justice. The involvement of the Union of India through the Learned Additional Solicitor General underscores the significance of governmental representation in legal proceedings, highlighting the judiciary's commitment to procedural fairness and rectifying errors. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303818