https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303822 Binding Supreme Court precedent on the issues raised meant no substantial question of law survived in the revenue's appeal. The Court noted that the questions were already covered by the Supreme Court ruling relied upon, and the review petition against that ruling had not been allowed, so the precedent remained binding. In those circumstances, the Court held that nothing remained for adjudication on a legal issue of substance and dismissed the appeal. en-us Tue, 10 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Jul 2023 12:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303822 Binding Supreme Court precedent on the issues raised meant no substantial question of law survived in the revenue's appeal. The Court noted that the questions were already covered by the Supreme Court ruling relied upon, and the review petition against that ruling had not been allowed, so the precedent remained binding. In those circumstances, the Court held that nothing remained for adjudication on a legal issue of substance and dismissed the appeal. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 10 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303822