https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303807 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA set aside an order denying credit to one appellant and confirming a demand against another. The first appellant, a manufacturer of railway track materials, argued inconsistency in treatment compared to a similar case involving their sister concern. They contended that the steel ingots used were of alloy specification, contrary to the Revenue's claim of non-alloy usage. The Tribunal remanded the matter for fresh consideration based on the acceptance of a previous order dropping a similar demand, ultimately disposing of the appeals through remand. en-us Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Aug 2022 14:50:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303807 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA set aside an order denying credit to one appellant and confirming a demand against another. The first appellant, a manufacturer of railway track materials, argued inconsistency in treatment compared to a similar case involving their sister concern. They contended that the steel ingots used were of alloy specification, contrary to the Revenue's claim of non-alloy usage. The Tribunal remanded the matter for fresh consideration based on the acceptance of a previous order dropping a similar demand, ultimately disposing of the appeals through remand. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303807