<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 632 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426393</link>
    <description>Calcutta HC set aside a lower court order and restored a writ petition to its original file for hearing on merits. The case involved identical facts to a previous decision where status quo was maintained. The court directed respondent authorities not to take coercive action against the appellant until the writ petition is heard by the Single Bench, continuing interim protection that had been granted during the pendency of proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 17:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 632 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426393</link>
      <description>Calcutta HC set aside a lower court order and restored a writ petition to its original file for hearing on merits. The case involved identical facts to a previous decision where status quo was maintained. The court directed respondent authorities not to take coercive action against the appellant until the writ petition is heard by the Single Bench, continuing interim protection that had been granted during the pendency of proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>