<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 623 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426384</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the order passed by the PCIT under section 263 was quashed. The Tribunal held that the PCIT cannot direct the AO to initiate penalty proceedings and that the AO&#039;s decision to initiate penalty proceedings under section 271AAB(1A) was a conscious and valid decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2022 10:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 623 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426384</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the order passed by the PCIT under section 263 was quashed. The Tribunal held that the PCIT cannot direct the AO to initiate penalty proceedings and that the AO&#039;s decision to initiate penalty proceedings under section 271AAB(1A) was a conscious and valid decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>