https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426369 A High Court will not entertain a writ petition under Article 226 against recovery and appellate orders passed by authorities outside its territorial jurisdiction, especially where deciding liability would require disputed factual determinations. The writ was therefore held not maintainable on territorial grounds. The Court also found that no order could be made against a third respondent whose action was not impugned in the petition, and any earlier restraint against that respondent was unwarranted. The petitioner was left to pursue remedies before the forum having proper jurisdiction. en-us Wed, 10 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Aug 2022 09:04:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426369 A High Court will not entertain a writ petition under Article 226 against recovery and appellate orders passed by authorities outside its territorial jurisdiction, especially where deciding liability would require disputed factual determinations. The writ was therefore held not maintainable on territorial grounds. The Court also found that no order could be made against a third respondent whose action was not impugned in the petition, and any earlier restraint against that respondent was unwarranted. The petitioner was left to pursue remedies before the forum having proper jurisdiction. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 10 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426369