<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 606 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426367</link>
    <description>The court upheld the conviction of the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act but modified the sentence. The petitioner was ordered to pay Rs.10 lakhs in total as compensation within ten weeks, with the one-year imprisonment sentence being substituted by a monetary penalty. Failure to pay would result in further legal action as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 09:04:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 606 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426367</link>
      <description>The court upheld the conviction of the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act but modified the sentence. The petitioner was ordered to pay Rs.10 lakhs in total as compensation within ten weeks, with the one-year imprisonment sentence being substituted by a monetary penalty. Failure to pay would result in further legal action as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>