https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30135 The appeal was filed against the Order-in-Original (OIO) passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mangalore, regarding the incorrect availing of Cenvat credit due to a mistake in the address on Central Excise invoices. The lower authority demanded the amount alleging improper availing of credit and imposed a penalty, which was upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals). However, the Member (T) found sufficient evidence to establish that the credit had not been irregularly availed. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. en-us Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30135 The appeal was filed against the Order-in-Original (OIO) passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mangalore, regarding the incorrect availing of Cenvat credit due to a mistake in the address on Central Excise invoices. The lower authority demanded the amount alleging improper availing of credit and imposed a penalty, which was upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals). However, the Member (T) found sufficient evidence to establish that the credit had not been irregularly availed. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30135