<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 918 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303793</link>
    <description>A winding-up petition was admitted, the Official Liquidator was appointed as Provisional Liquidator, and citation was directed to be published in accordance with Rule 24 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. The operative effect was to advance the winding-up process by securing provisional control over the company&#039;s affairs and requiring public notice through citation publication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2022 11:52:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 918 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303793</link>
      <description>A winding-up petition was admitted, the Official Liquidator was appointed as Provisional Liquidator, and citation was directed to be published in accordance with Rule 24 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. The operative effect was to advance the winding-up process by securing provisional control over the company&#039;s affairs and requiring public notice through citation publication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>