<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1369 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303791</link>
    <description>The appeals for the assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12 were allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-examine the trust deed to determine if the shops in question were part of the property as per the trust deed. If so, the assessee would qualify for exemption under sections 11 and 12; otherwise, any addition should be limited to the extent of the violation. The order was pronounced on June 28, 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2022 08:07:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1369 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303791</link>
      <description>The appeals for the assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12 were allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-examine the trust deed to determine if the shops in question were part of the property as per the trust deed. If so, the assessee would qualify for exemption under sections 11 and 12; otherwise, any addition should be limited to the extent of the violation. The order was pronounced on June 28, 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>