https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426353 In writ proceedings challenging GST adjudication, an interim stay condition requiring deposit of 10% of the entire demand was found overly onerous. The court noted that while security could be ordered under Rule 51 of the Calcutta High Court Rules to protect revenue, the benchmark was more appropriately aligned with the GST appellate pre-deposit standard of 10% of the tax in dispute. The condition was therefore modified, and the appellants were directed to deposit 10% of the tax in dispute instead of 10% of the entire demand. en-us Thu, 11 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Apr 2025 17:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426353 In writ proceedings challenging GST adjudication, an interim stay condition requiring deposit of 10% of the entire demand was found overly onerous. The court noted that while security could be ordered under Rule 51 of the Calcutta High Court Rules to protect revenue, the benchmark was more appropriately aligned with the GST appellate pre-deposit standard of 10% of the tax in dispute. The condition was therefore modified, and the appellants were directed to deposit 10% of the tax in dispute instead of 10% of the entire demand. Case-Laws GST Thu, 11 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426353