<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 574 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426335</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The disallowance of the guarantee fee and delayed EPF and ESI payments were deleted based on evidence and legal precedents. The Tribunal found the CIT(A) had jurisdiction to decide without fresh material, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2022 13:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 574 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426335</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The disallowance of the guarantee fee and delayed EPF and ESI payments were deleted based on evidence and legal precedents. The Tribunal found the CIT(A) had jurisdiction to decide without fresh material, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>