<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 569 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426330</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the reassessment proceedings were invalid and quashed the second reopening of the assessment. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, and the order of the CIT(A) was upheld. The Tribunal emphasized that the AO&#039;s action was a mere change of opinion, which is not permissible under the law, and the reassessment proceedings initiated beyond four years were not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2022 08:06:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 569 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426330</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the reassessment proceedings were invalid and quashed the second reopening of the assessment. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, and the order of the CIT(A) was upheld. The Tribunal emphasized that the AO&#039;s action was a mere change of opinion, which is not permissible under the law, and the reassessment proceedings initiated beyond four years were not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>