<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 567 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426328</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the AO and CIT(A) violated principles of natural justice by not appreciating the Khataunies proving the existence of donors and wrongly holding that certain donors failed to appear. The matter was remitted to the AO for a fresh decision after summoning the thirteen donors and providing the assessee with a proper opportunity of hearing. The appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2022 08:06:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 567 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426328</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the AO and CIT(A) violated principles of natural justice by not appreciating the Khataunies proving the existence of donors and wrongly holding that certain donors failed to appear. The matter was remitted to the AO for a fresh decision after summoning the thirteen donors and providing the assessee with a proper opportunity of hearing. The appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>