<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 564 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426325</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under section 263 for A.Y. 2014-15, stating that the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to conduct necessary inquiries rendered the assessment order erroneous. It disallowed trading losses claimed by the assessee company for Futures &amp;amp; Options trading conducted by directors in their personal capacity, emphasizing the separation of accounts between directors and the company. The Tribunal also found the Board resolution authorizing directors to trade did not cover personal trading activities and criticized the inadequate inquiry by the Assessing Officer, ultimately dismissing the assessee&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2014-15 and allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2015-16.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2022 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 564 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426325</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under section 263 for A.Y. 2014-15, stating that the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to conduct necessary inquiries rendered the assessment order erroneous. It disallowed trading losses claimed by the assessee company for Futures &amp;amp; Options trading conducted by directors in their personal capacity, emphasizing the separation of accounts between directors and the company. The Tribunal also found the Board resolution authorizing directors to trade did not cover personal trading activities and criticized the inadequate inquiry by the Assessing Officer, ultimately dismissing the assessee&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2014-15 and allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2015-16.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>