<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 12 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30126</link>
    <description>Mere procurement or booking of orders on commission basis for a principal does not fall within clearing and forwarding agent service under the Finance Act. The analysis applies the Larger Bench view that such activity, without additional clearing or forwarding functions, is outside the statutory definition. On that basis, the service was held not taxable as clearing and forwarding agency service and the demand could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 12 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30126</link>
      <description>Mere procurement or booking of orders on commission basis for a principal does not fall within clearing and forwarding agent service under the Finance Act. The analysis applies the Larger Bench view that such activity, without additional clearing or forwarding functions, is outside the statutory definition. On that basis, the service was held not taxable as clearing and forwarding agency service and the demand could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>