https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426295 Inherent jurisdiction to quash criminal proceedings must be exercised only after a meaningful examination of the allegations and investigative material. The High Court erred by issuing a brief quashing order based mainly on the complainant's cheque leaf and signature, without assessing the factual context of the alleged wrongful procurement, forgery, and attempt to extract money. The SC held that such a cryptic approach is unsustainable, set aside the quashing order, and remitted the matter for fresh consideration in accordance with law. en-us Thu, 11 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Aug 2022 08:03:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426295 Inherent jurisdiction to quash criminal proceedings must be exercised only after a meaningful examination of the allegations and investigative material. The High Court erred by issuing a brief quashing order based mainly on the complainant's cheque leaf and signature, without assessing the factual context of the alleged wrongful procurement, forgery, and attempt to extract money. The SC held that such a cryptic approach is unsustainable, set aside the quashing order, and remitted the matter for fresh consideration in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426295