https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426294 In quashing proceedings under Section 482 CrPC, the court should not assess disputed defence material or conduct a roving enquiry where the complaint and supporting material prima facie disclose the ingredients of the offence and the accused's involvement. A director's plea of prior resignation will not justify quashing under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act when the complaint alleges responsibility for the company's business and the resignation claim itself raises factual disputes requiring trial. The proceeding was therefore permitted to continue, and the quash petition failed. en-us Thu, 11 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Aug 2022 08:03:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426294 In quashing proceedings under Section 482 CrPC, the court should not assess disputed defence material or conduct a roving enquiry where the complaint and supporting material prima facie disclose the ingredients of the offence and the accused's involvement. A director's plea of prior resignation will not justify quashing under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act when the complaint alleges responsibility for the company's business and the resignation claim itself raises factual disputes requiring trial. The proceeding was therefore permitted to continue, and the quash petition failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426294