<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1985 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303778</link>
    <description>The appeal challenged the initiation of proceedings u/s 147/148 of the Income-tax Act, alleging lack of cogent material for believing in income escapement. The CIT(A) upheld the initiation citing specific details connecting the appellant to the scheme. The Tribunal found the reopening lacked a valid reason to believe, quashed the reassessment order, and allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2022 20:40:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1985 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303778</link>
      <description>The appeal challenged the initiation of proceedings u/s 147/148 of the Income-tax Act, alleging lack of cogent material for believing in income escapement. The CIT(A) upheld the initiation citing specific details connecting the appellant to the scheme. The Tribunal found the reopening lacked a valid reason to believe, quashed the reassessment order, and allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>