<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1411 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303776</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding decisions on two issues: 1) Expenditure on education of Directors&#039; children was not considered a valid business expense, based on precedents from the Madras High Court. 2) Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act was upheld, with the Tribunal finding Rule 8D mandatory for computing disallowance and confirming the decision of the CIT(Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2022 20:40:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1411 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303776</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding decisions on two issues: 1) Expenditure on education of Directors&#039; children was not considered a valid business expense, based on precedents from the Madras High Court. 2) Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act was upheld, with the Tribunal finding Rule 8D mandatory for computing disallowance and confirming the decision of the CIT(Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>