<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>LEGAL INSANITY v. MEDICAL INSANITY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10600</link>
    <description>The legal test for excusing criminal liability requires proof that, at the time of the act, by reason of unsoundness of mind the accused was incapable of knowing the nature of the act or that it was wrong or contrary to law; medical diagnosis alone is insufficient, the accused bears the onus on a balance of probabilities and must adduce contemporaneous conduct, medical evidence, and prior history to establish legal insanity at the time of the offence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2022 08:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2022 08:39:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>LEGAL INSANITY v. MEDICAL INSANITY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10600</link>
      <description>The legal test for excusing criminal liability requires proof that, at the time of the act, by reason of unsoundness of mind the accused was incapable of knowing the nature of the act or that it was wrong or contrary to law; medical diagnosis alone is insufficient, the accused bears the onus on a balance of probabilities and must adduce contemporaneous conduct, medical evidence, and prior history to establish legal insanity at the time of the offence.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Other Topics</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2022 08:39:45 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>