<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 523 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426284</link>
    <description>Whether land qualifies as agricultural land depends on a cumulative assessment of all relevant facts and surrounding circumstances, including revenue classification, actual use, development around the property, the nature of the purchaser, the price fetched, and the parties&#039; conduct. Revenue records and an assertion of agricultural use are not decisive if the overall evidence indicates a non-agricultural character. Applying these settled tests to the same jointly owned suburban property, and finding no material difference from the earlier co-owner&#039;s case, the land was treated as non-agricultural and the long-term capital gains addition was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2022 08:31:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 523 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426284</link>
      <description>Whether land qualifies as agricultural land depends on a cumulative assessment of all relevant facts and surrounding circumstances, including revenue classification, actual use, development around the property, the nature of the purchaser, the price fetched, and the parties&#039; conduct. Revenue records and an assertion of agricultural use are not decisive if the overall evidence indicates a non-agricultural character. Applying these settled tests to the same jointly owned suburban property, and finding no material difference from the earlier co-owner&#039;s case, the land was treated as non-agricultural and the long-term capital gains addition was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>