https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303765 A motor accident claim may be maintained on strict liability even without proof of rashness or negligence where the accident arises from the use of a motor vehicle. The Court treated the common law rule in Rylands v. Fletcher as applicable to motor accident claims, subject to recognised exceptions, and distinguished it from statutory no-fault liability. For quantification, the structured formula in the Second Schedule was used as a guide to assess just compensation, with interest awarded and the amount already paid under no-fault liability deducted from the principal and the balance recalculated accordingly. en-us Wed, 03 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Aug 2022 18:07:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303765 A motor accident claim may be maintained on strict liability even without proof of rashness or negligence where the accident arises from the use of a motor vehicle. The Court treated the common law rule in Rylands v. Fletcher as applicable to motor accident claims, subject to recognised exceptions, and distinguished it from statutory no-fault liability. For quantification, the structured formula in the Second Schedule was used as a guide to assess just compensation, with interest awarded and the amount already paid under no-fault liability deducted from the principal and the balance recalculated accordingly. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 03 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303765