<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 479 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426240</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking to quash the summoning order under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, considering the permission granted to continue with the complaint proceedings and the absence of a final winding-up order at the time of filing the complaint. The court emphasized that the complaint was validly instituted before the final winding-up order and that the pending winding-up petition did not render the complaint under Section 138 invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2022 20:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 479 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426240</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking to quash the summoning order under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, considering the permission granted to continue with the complaint proceedings and the absence of a final winding-up order at the time of filing the complaint. The court emphasized that the complaint was validly instituted before the final winding-up order and that the pending winding-up petition did not render the complaint under Section 138 invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>