https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30107 Sufficient cause was shown for condonation of a 39-day delay in filing the appeal where affidavits from the managing director and former accountant explained that the impugned order was received by the accountant but was not communicated to management, and that the accountant later resigned and was occupied with MBA admission formalities. Accepting these explanations, CESTAT exercised its discretion to condone the delay. The stay applications were not decided at this stage and were directed to be taken up on the listed date. en-us Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30107 Sufficient cause was shown for condonation of a 39-day delay in filing the appeal where affidavits from the managing director and former accountant explained that the impugned order was received by the accountant but was not communicated to management, and that the accountant later resigned and was occupied with MBA admission formalities. Accepting these explanations, CESTAT exercised its discretion to condone the delay. The stay applications were not decided at this stage and were directed to be taken up on the listed date. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30107