<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 476 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426237</link>
    <description>A pending corporate insolvency resolution process and the statutory moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code justified deferring further hearing of appeals against the corporate debtor. The Tribunal noted that parallel Supreme Court proceedings raised overlapping issues concerning the approved resolution plan and CIRP cost determinations, and that simultaneous continuation could create conflicting outcomes. On considerations of judicial propriety, comity and prudence, it deferred the main appeals for 12 weeks while the parties pursued remedies before the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2022 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 476 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426237</link>
      <description>A pending corporate insolvency resolution process and the statutory moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code justified deferring further hearing of appeals against the corporate debtor. The Tribunal noted that parallel Supreme Court proceedings raised overlapping issues concerning the approved resolution plan and CIRP cost determinations, and that simultaneous continuation could create conflicting outcomes. On considerations of judicial propriety, comity and prudence, it deferred the main appeals for 12 weeks while the parties pursued remedies before the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>