<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessee&#039;s failure to disclose taxable services leads to tax payment after notice; extended limitation applies despite penalty exemption.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=65055</link>
    <description>Extended period of limitation - The assessee has not disclosed the value of taxable service for the period 10.9.2004 to 31.7.2007 in their ST 3 Returns filed to the department. Only when the department issued a show cause notice, the responded bank remitted the amount of tax. Hence, merely because they were exonerated under Section 80 of the Act from payment of penalty for reasonable cause for non payment the same yardstick cannot be taken by the bank to contend that the extended period of limitation as prescribed under proviso to section 73 of the Act is available. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2022 09:30:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2022 09:30:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessee&#039;s failure to disclose taxable services leads to tax payment after notice; extended limitation applies despite penalty exemption.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=65055</link>
      <description>Extended period of limitation - The assessee has not disclosed the value of taxable service for the period 10.9.2004 to 31.7.2007 in their ST 3 Returns filed to the department. Only when the department issued a show cause notice, the responded bank remitted the amount of tax. Hence, merely because they were exonerated under Section 80 of the Act from payment of penalty for reasonable cause for non payment the same yardstick cannot be taken by the bank to contend that the extended period of limitation as prescribed under proviso to section 73 of the Act is available. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2022 09:30:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=65055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>